Population Research Institue

       12 March 2008     Vol. 10 / No. 10


Dear Colleague,
The Commonwealth of Virginia has just zeroed out Planned Parenthood's
funding. Other states should follow Virginia's lead.
Steven W. Mosher
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOSES IN VIRGINIA
by Steve Mosher and Colin Mason
The amendment, cutting up to a half million dollars in funding from the abortion giant, passed by the
narrowest of margins. The vote in the Virginia Senate was 20 votes in favor of the amendment and 20 against,
and Lt. Governor Bolling had to break the tie. The amendment could still be vetoed by Governor Kaine later
this month, although this would tarnish the moderate image he is trying to project. In all likelihood, Planned
Parenthood faces a complete funding cut, and one that will last at least until 2010.
Feminist groups originally aimed their ire at Republican Ken Cuccinelli, who introduced the legislation. But
they soon found a new target: Senator Charles Colgan, a pro-life Democrat who broke party ranks to cross the
aisle and vote with Republicans.
Colgan faced withering opposition from within his own party in the days leading up to the vote, yet held firm
to his pro-life convictions. "It was pretty tough," Colgan told the Associated Press on the 27th. "They really
wanted me to change my position, but I couldn't do it." His vote turned an expected 21 to 19 defeat of the
amendment into a 20-20 tie, which in turn brought in Lt. Gov. Bolling to cast the tie-breaking vote against
Planned Parenthood.


Charles Colgan,
Senior Democrat,
Virginia Senate
      The vote was greeted with near hysteria by Planned Parenthood's supporters, who over the years they
have come to think of taxpayer funding for its sterilization and contraception programs, which largely target
Blacks and other minorities, as a right.
"This amendment is not intended to save money," complained an opinion piece in the Commonwealth Times.
"It is a way for lawmakers to get around Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court case that made abortions legal in the
United States, without directly confronting the constitutionality of the decision."
Never mind that this legislative decision does not in any way address the constitutionality of abortion, only
whether Virginia residents should be forced to fund an abortion group with their tax dollars. The Times
apparently believes that abortion-on-demand is a human right, and that groups who perform abortions should
automatically receive state funding.


The pro-choice blog Feministing.com is quick to pigeonhole all pro-life senators as "anti-choice." The web site
insists that these lawmakers "aren't concerned about preventing abortion - if they were, they'd be touting birth
control - their real concern is limiting women's choices and rolling back our rights."
The idea that pro-life senators spend their time plotting to find ways to subjugate modern women is laughable,
especially given the fact that the deciding vote was cast by Charles Colgan, a moderate Democrat from
Manassas.
Another feminist site, Feministe, goes a step further. Not only does it claim that Planned Parenthood helps to
prevent abortions, but it further maintains that the funds would have gone toward non-abortion-related
activities, anyway. "Jill," one of the blog's contributors, says, "Federal aid, and state aid from Virginia, are not
paying for abortions. They are paying for pre-natal care, women's health care, birth control, and sexual health
education. Millions of women across the country benefit from those programs — and I'm one of them."
Perhaps someone should explain the concept of fungibility to "Jill." All the money that Planned Parenthood
receives goes into the same kitty, and is impossible to track from there. As long as Planned Parenthood
performs abortions, there is no way to give them money without in some way funding those abortions.
The Population Research Institute commends this pro-life amendment, and we would like to encourage other
states to follow Virginia's example.
It's not as if Planned Parenthood needs the money. The abortion giant turns a huge profit each year, and has an
endowment of over a half billion dollars. Killing babies is big business.
Years ago, Planned Parenthood declared Fr. Paul Marx, the founder of PRI, to be public enemy number one. In
fact, it is Planned Parenthood itself that is the number one enemy of the American people.
In the years since Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood has killed more Americans than all the wars that America
has ever fought.
Steve Mosher is the President at PRI, and Colin Mason is the Director for Media Production.





      Sign up for the Weekly Briefing Here

Media Contact: Colin Mason
Email: colin@pop.org
(540) 622-5240, ext. 209
_________
(c) 2007 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.
Redistribute widely. Credit required.
_________
PRI is a 501(c)(3) educational organization. If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation to PRI,
please go to our Donations Page.  All donations (of any size) are welcomed and appreciated.
_________
The pro-life Population Research Institute is dedicated to ending human
rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending
counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of
"overpopulation." Find us at www.pop.org.
PRI, PO Box 1559, Front Royal, VA 22630 USA     Phone: 540-622-5240
               
                      
Central Montana Right to Life
"United Voices for the Unborn, the Elderly, the Infirm"